tomcarroll.org

Tom the Architect

tomcarroll.org header image 2

Coginitive Efficiencies - Friedrich Nietzsche - Jeff Veen

July 19th, 2006 by Tom

I was reading Jeffrey Veen’s post titled “Intellectual Bargain Shopping” and found the quote below by Friedrich Nietzsche to be very interesting.

To predict the behavior of ordinary people in advance, you only have to assume that they will always try to escape a disagreeable situation with the smallest possible expenditure of intelligence.

Jeffrey Veen comments on the quote,

I love how this quote turns the tables. Users aren’t stupid, they’re efficient. They’re spending the least amount of effort (i.e. intelligence) as they possible can on each step of the goal they’re trying to achieve. If you make them spend more, they’ll go somewhere else — it’s like intellectual bargain shopping.

Let me refine Jeffrey’s thought of user efficiency a bit. People want to expend as little cognitive capital (attention, perception, action, problem solving and memory) as possible to obtain a reasonable or sufficient value. This is why I believe that people are going to demand products and services that create cognitive efficiencies. As applications and services are built today few take into consideration the level of efficiency the customer desires. The more we focus on cognitive efficiencies, the more valuable our applications and services will become. It really is about what you give not what you get.

Links:
Jeffrey Veen’s RSS Feed
Intellectual Bargain Shopping

Tags:   · · 2 Comments

Leave A Comment

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Poseidon715 Jul 23, 2006 at 9:57 pm

    Forgive me, but I am only responding as Nietzsche himself would in this situation.

    Given this definition of users, the ultimate example of cognitive efficiency is network TV.

  • 2 Anonymous Aug 22, 2006 at 10:02 am

    Tue Aug 22, 2006 at 9:02 AM by poseidon715 in Technology, Philosophy. trackback Nietzsche has gained certain popularity among my friends in Information Architecture over the past couple of weeks. I surely donĂ¢??t want to miss …